Wednesday, October 29, 2008

The unexpected consequences of dating me.

Corey bought me a pumpkin.


So, like any good pumpkin owner the week before Halloween, I decided to carve it.

It was a very nice carving pumpkin, so I knew whatever I carved on it had to live up to high standards. What better than to celebrate the benefactor?




Monday, October 20, 2008

Introducing... Charlotte

So, not long after posting about my bicycle cl addiction, I succumbed to my disease and purchased another bicycle. Note that I do not say "a new" bicycle, but "another bicycle." Without a doubt the least aesthetic bicycle I have ever owned, she is an old Free Spirit, now known as Charlotte.Damn, girl. Them's some ugly.

Charlotte is a horrible tan color that places her squarely in the 1970's. When I got her, she was was accented with equally horrible red stripe stickers.
Sort of like the makeup on a teenage whore.

After many hours of work, I've managed to remove most of these. I'm aided in my endeavors by the fact that I fully intend to repaint her (Would you keep a bicycle this color?!). This means that I don't have to pay really any attention to the paint underneath the sitckers, and can scratch it up as much as I want.

Charlotte is a single-speed in the same spirit as Eileen--someone got rid of the derailler and gear shifts and slapped a smaller chain on her. Very half assed. In any case, I've decided to work Charlotte back up to a ten-speed, and leave Eileen as a single speed. I bought some new bars, and I'm (eventually) going to put them on Eileen and move her drops over to Charlotte. Eventually. I've gotta buy new brake levers and some grips before I do that.

Charlotte might not be a pretty bicycle, but she's got a ton of character, and I'm secretly in love with her and all of her crappiness.

The first thing I did was remove her fender. I'm not going to throw it away or anything, but it's really not my style, and it wasn't installed particularly well in the first place, resulting in a ceaseless metallic chatter. It was driving me nuts, so I solved the problem.
A sad story, the fender has been shunned by even my mop and her boyfriend, the burned pot holder.

Both wheels needed air when I got her, so after removing the fender and reattaching the rear wheel, I proceeded to try to pump the pair of them up. After laboring for a number of minutes with the cheap inefficient Schwinn handpump my father gave me for my birthday, the wheel was approaching ridability, when suddenly my ears were greeted with the sound of rushing air. "Noooooooooo!" I let go of the pump and laid down on the carpet defeated. "What happened?" Charles asked, and reached for the pump, only to start laughing. Turns out I'd pulled the valve completely off the tube. Oooooops. Well, it probably meant I needed new tubes anyways.


Really, I'm just that strong.

Speaking of the rear wheel, perhaps the greatest thing about it is the high pressure tire she's equipped with. How do I know the tire is high pressure? Because it tells me so, baby.

I'm singing Queen in my head now, are you?

"Damn!" you're probably saying. "How high pressure is high pressure?" Let me tell you: Charlotte's rear wheel clocks in at an impressive 90 PSI. High pressure, indeed!

The front wheel, although not self-admitted to be "high pressure" has quite a fabulous (and utilitarian-looking) reflector.

As cool as this reflector truly is, it has nothing on the one mounted on the front of the bike, which really can't even be described in words:

Next best thing to a headlight.

Moving slightly upwards, the greatness continues. Charlotte's got incredibly wide handlebars--"like a cruiser-mountain bike!" Charles and I joked.
I know nothing about Picasa, but as far as I can tell, it doesn't exist for Macs and my photo is staying sideways.


Somethings should be more than 2 feet long, but not handlebars.

But what's even better than the absurd width of these bars --and perhaps my favorite part of the bicycle--is the fact that the grips don't match . Although the brake levers don't match either, this isn't quite as remarkable. Many people buy brake levers one-at-a-time, but grips?! I don't even think you can buy those one at a time. How Charlotte ended up with two different grips, when they're sold exclusively in pairs, is a mystery I doubt that I will ever solve.I guess it's sort of like having one boob a whole lot bigger than the other. Or one nad. Or whatever.

Beyond the brake levers, though, the handlebars have an interesting paint job. Obviously completed some time ago, judging from the number of scratches and nicks in the paint, someone was an incredibly lazy painter. While it's not unheard of by any means to leave your handlebars attached to your stem so that you don't scratch the new paint as you reinstall them, generally those who do this are careful to tape the stem. This is not the case on Charlotte--whose stem is painted, and whose bars are scratched to hell. Poor girl. But it definitely gives her character!


Just to sum things up, here is a photo of the bad ass fake tattoo that I applied this morning:
He's so awesome that he only uses his firebreathing ability to roast marshmellows. And veggie kebabs.

If you can't tell, that is a powerful, deathly dragon on top of a red burst of bicycle loving. And here is a big man on my little bicycle:

Friday, October 17, 2008

The current state of (my) affairs.

It's been a fabulous week, completely lacking in productivity. However, I am finally finished with my Fulbright application and with that entire process, and it's nice to have crossed one thing off of my endless to-do list. At the same time, I was supposed to submit a five page draft to the American Studies Honor Thesis head today, and I'm not doing it. I don't even have ONE page, much less enough information to write about.

At some point I'm going to blog about Charlotte, my "new" bicycle. She's an old Free Spirit, but was pretty cheap, and is my new project. As a very task oriented person, I find having projects to be very fulfilling. This is likely why I also enjoy jigsaw puzzles, sudoku, and blogging. Yet after setting new time-spent and words-written records with my Wednesday post, I'm going to keep it a bit shorter and more light-hearted today.

Charles and I were hanging out yesterday, bemoaning how hungry we were. "What's cheap?" I asked. "Pizza?" He urged me to check pizza chain websites for coupons, to see if there were any great deals. I logged onto Dominos.com and clicked to look at coupons.

To our delight, Domino's currently has a deal for a large, one-topping, carry out pizza for only $3.99. A large pizza for $4.00?! Charles was almost excited as I was.

But price is hardly where the wonders stopped. Not only were Charles and I about to get a rad deal, but we could even order our pizza online. Selecting mushrooms (perhaps the greatest pizza topping EVER), we placed our order and we greeted by a PIZZA TRACKER window.


Besides asking the invasive question about my political affiliations, this screen--with live updating!--informed us what stage of the pizza-making process our pizza was at, as well who was making it (Ashanti) and when she'd started making it. Charles and I unanimously agreed that this was the coolest thing we'd seen all day.

Once our pizza was done, we drove down to pick it up, leaving the tracker up in the browser while we were gone. When we returned home, we found that the pizza tracker had tracked us all the way to the pickup, giving us a nifty thank you.

No, thank you.

I will be ordering all my $4.00 pizzas online from here on out.

In other news, I'm not sure if anyone noticed my little Freudian slip in Wednesday's post, or even if anyone made it all the way through my entire essay. Although I edited the post so that it now reads correctly, I've included a screen shot of the typo for your convenience.

There's nothing sexier than a man with an analog camera in his hard.

To sum this all up with something that's likely way too obvious, I've rediscovered the screen capture. And it feels great.

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

Pick up your cameras and use them.

I had the most singularly amazing moment on my bicycle today. I had to drop something off at the study abroad office, so instead of my normal route home (which is just to ride up Speedway), I rode through West Campus (stopping at Junior's to chat with Jeremy), then turned onto 34th so that I could cross Guadalupe and get back to Speedway. I pulled up behind the cars waiting for the light to change, when suddenly the day's peace was shattered. The Toyota directly in front of me had all of its windows open as it sat, waiting for the green, the quiet of a rainy afternoon as people lunched on the patio of Food Head's. I dropped my toes to the ground, when a dog poked its head out of the passenger side window of the Toyota, turned around to peer at me. "WOOF!"

Apparently, this was the go sign, because a black pitt's head appeared through the rear driver side window, only to be quickly joined by a black lab which materialized at the rear passenger window. The normal sedan in front of me ahd been transformed into a barking motorcade. As I sat at the stoplight, three large dogs, each with their own open window, barking backwards at me, I leaned forward a bit over my handlebars, smiling. Wait, what was that? Was that? Yes... Yes. It was a little Boston Terrier in the rear window, on the back of the seats, jumping in the window and barking at me as well. I had four dogs in front of me, each with its own window, barking at me. It was fantastic.

Yesterday, Fidel posted an article to /r/snobs, titled "Hipster: The Dead End of Western Civilization," then blogged about it. He seemed to generally support the article, but I think it's vapid, foppish swill. I'm about to join that party.

To sum up the article, hipsters are destroying culture because they take everything and give nothing back, acting as mindless consumers in the name of independent individuality. Give me a break.

An artificial appropriation of different styles from different eras, the hipster represents the end of Western civilization – a culture lost in the superficiality of its past and unable to create any new meaning. Not only is it unsustainable, it is suicidal. While previous youth movements have challenged the dysfunction and decadence of their elders, today we have the “hipster” – a youth subculture that mirrors the doomed shallowness of mainstream society.


Poor Mr. Haddow. The 20th century in America is rife with examples of youth movements that haven't "challenged the dysfunction and decadence of their elders." Examples that immediately come to mind are the youth of the 1920's (women drinking, smoking, and swearing is hardly challenging dysfunction and is certainly glorifying decadence); the "countercultural" youth of the late 1960's and early 1970's, who defined coolness" by running away from the midwest to become a homeless, hapless drug addicts in Haight-Ashbury, who justified a life of theft with by idea of being "revolutionary" and raping women by the idea of "sexual freedom"; the entire youth "movement" of the 1980's, which glammified heavy metal, leotards, and big hair, as well as sex and drugs; and even more recently, the grunge movement of the early 1990's which was co-opted and commercialized in such a way that its figurehead and poet laureate (who made the idea of living underneathe a bridge cool) committed suicide. Yet, to date, 21st century hipsterism is apparently the first of these subcultures to mirror the "doomed shallowness of mainstream society."

Take a stroll down the street in any major North American or European city and you’ll be sure to see a speckle of fashion-conscious twentysomethings hanging about and sporting a number of predictable stylistic trademarks: skinny jeans, cotton spandex leggings, fixed-gear bikes, vintage flannel, fake eyeglasses and a keffiyeh – initially sported by Jewish students and Western protesters to express solidarity with Palestinians, the keffiyeh has become a completely meaningless hipster cliché fashion accessory.

This new idea of Western youth trying to be fashionable, dear God, is going to kill society. Nevermind that there is nothing wrong with wearing skinny jeans or vintage flannel or fake eyeglasses or leggings (although I personally agree that leggings are God awful). And let's not even get started on how horrible this appropriation of a meaningful symbol in the name of fashion is. This is much worse and more meaningless than wider society's adoption of Che Guevara, DARE t-shirts, POW/MIA soldier name bracelets during Vietnam, or Livestrong bracelets as markers of cool.

The American Apparel V-neck shirt, Pabst Blue Ribbon beer and Parliament cigarettes are symbols and icons of working or revolutionary classes that have been appropriated by hipsterdom and drained of meaning. Ten years ago, a man wearing a plain V-neck tee and drinking a Pabst would never be accused of being a trend-follower. But in 2008, such things have become shameless clichés of a class of individuals that seek to escape their own wealth and privilege by immersing themselves in the aesthetic of the working class.
Yes, these three items have become completely devoid of meaning. They have lost the historical significance they may have once had. PBR was one of the defining brews that appeared in the US in the late 1800's, and it could truly be seen as a symbol for American history and should be upheld with such honor. The fact that today's working classes almost invariably prefer Bud Light has nothing to do with whether or not PBR still symbolizes them. Shame on hipsters for imbibing it, this symbol of such patriotism, when they could be drinking the even more tasteless, more popular beer of the contemporary working class--even if Budweiser isn't even an American company anymore. It's not what the damn beer is, it's what it stands for.

And don't even get me started on the v-neck! At least they aren't wearing Doc Marten's which "first catapulted from a working class icon to a counter-cultural icon in the 1960's" and by the mid 90's had "festered in the minds of the youth" (as per the official Doc Marten website). And thank God they weren't wearing cammo, adopting the image and symbol of the nation's fighting forces, or the Mohawk, co-opting a symbol and style of a Native American tribe from the precolonial times. Adoption of these things certainly would have resulted in the spontaneous implosion of Western civilization, but as these kids have only adopted the v-neck, we're just at a "dead end." We can still turn around!

This obsession with “street-cred” reaches its apex of absurdity as hipsters have recently and wholeheartedly adopted the fixed-gear bike as the only acceptable form of transportation – only to have brakes installed on a piece of machinery that is defined by its lack thereof.


I am relieved that Mr. Haddow pointed out this obvious hypocrisy. Sure, some states, like Texas, consider the absence of a brake on a vehicle to be illegal, but there is no way these kids would ruin the light, streamlined appearence of their bicycles so that they might be street legal! Moreover, it's not like correctly riding a brakeless fixie requires any skill or strength. What, you don't think everyone can just hop on one and be able to do that? There's no learning process! There's no need to be able to stop on a dime! It's not like cars don't cut you off or passengers open doors directly in front of you, or people step in front of your bicycle....

Lovers of apathy and irony, hipsters are connected through a global network of blogs and shops that push forth a global vision of fashion-informed aesthetics. Loosely associated with some form of creative output, they attend art parties, take lo-fi pictures with analog cameras, ride their bikes to night clubs and sweat it up at nouveau disco-coke parties. The hipster tends to religiously blog about their daily exploits, usually while leafing through generation-defining magazines like Vice, Another Magazine and Wallpaper. This cursory and stylized lifestyle has made the hipster almost universally loathed.
What makes all this all the more horrible is the fact that hipsters are using modern technology, specifically the internet, to be connected. Can you imagine?! Science has given them all sorts of tools, and the bastards are using them. To do WHAT? To plan ART PARTIES? You must be kidding. I bet they even display analog photos at these, which is completely absurd. Analog photography has never in the history of the world, had any historical or artistic importance. It's a completely worthless technology, and has always been! But let's get back to those art parties. The fact that these kids are creating anything, no matter how trite, is beyond contemptable. Couldn't they play a video game or something? Instead, they're purchasing art supplies, selling art, and having parties about it, as if art is supposed to accessible and fun. This is without a doubt the "dead end" of civilization. Personally, I would be thrilled if we were to reinstate the Academy that ruled the art world at the turn of the century. I don't want to look at Picasso or Mondrian or even those panderers like Monet or Manet. I want a classically styled portrait, and I want it now.

But beyond that, the fact that these kids are going to nightclubs on their bicycles--which one can only assume they only do so that they can be seen riding their brakeless fixed gears in skinny jeans (which never get stuck in their bicycle chains even though they don't have to roll them up--seriously, these clowns should walk around looking respectable with one pant leg rolled up like all of us normal cyclists)--is absurd. Absurd. Why these kids don't just hop in cars and drive downtown is beyond me. It's not like they would have to cruise around for half an hour looking for a free spot, ending up paying $10.00 to park in some seedy garage guarded by a leering parking lot patroller. No, driving downtown on the weekend is simple and easy and cheap as hell.

And to continue on with this paragraph, the fact that hipsters blog about their exploits AND read magazines is particularly what makes them loathful. I hate being forced to read their pathetic attempts at self publication almost as much as I hate the fact that I have to see them in coffee shops browsing their free copies of Vice magazine. Don't they know how these behaviors inconvenience and intrude upon me?

"These hipster zombies… are the idols of the style pages, the darlings of viral marketers and the marks of predatory real-estate agents,” wrote Christian Lorentzen in a Time Out New York article entitled ‘Why the Hipster Must Die.’ “And they must be buried for cool to be reborn.”
Once again, Haddow hits upon an important point here. It is the completely the hipsters' fault that style pages and viral marketers and real-estate agents are attracted to them. Can you believe that they let these "culture" and "style" magazines cover their pages with the fashions these hipsters have chosen? And can you beleive that they allow our Western, capitalistic society to market to them, trying to sell them goods and services? I know that viral campaigns are often online and that it makes sense to use that tactic to try and target consumers who use the internet, but as we already discussed above, the hipster shouldn't be online. It's the rest of us that should be the objects of these marketing campaigns.

With nothing to defend, uphold or even embrace, the idea of “hipsterdom” is left wide open for attack. And yet, it is this ironic lack of authenticity that has allowed hipsterdom to grow into a global phenomenon that is set to consume the very core of Western counterculture. Most critics make a point of attacking the hipster’s lack of individuality, but it is this stubborn obfuscation that distinguishes them from their predecessors, while allowing hipsterdom to easily blend in and mutate other social movements, sub-cultures and lifestyles.

Here, Haddow writes the obvious, that hipsters have "nothing to defend, uphold, or embrace." Why else would he write an entire 2,013 word article about them? Undertaking such a challenge clearly underscores and illustrates his prowess as a writer. He's taken a worthless topic and written an entire an essay--and to say that isn't impressive would be a blatant lie. And to suggest that it's the lack of indivuality that sets them apart, what an irony! The fact that they "blend in and mutate other social movements, sub-cultures and lifestyles" beautifully illustrates this lack of indivuality of authenticity and individuality. We all know it's impossible for anyone to have interests that lie in more than subculture, movement, or lifestyle--real individuals are devoted entirely to only one of these. The fact that this idea--that people can bridge interests, movements, and lifestyles--is going global is truly terrifying. We must act now to prevent any type of--gasp--global unity. We cannot afford to allow any sort of international community to develop, especially one that overcomes gaps between different cultural groups. Oh, the inauthenticity that would result!

Gavin McInnes, one of the founders of Vice, who recently left the magazine, is considered to be one of hipsterdom’s primary architects. But, in contrast to the majority of concerned media-types, McInnes, whose “Dos and Don’ts” commentary defined the rules of hipster fashion for over a decade, is more critical of those doing the criticizing.

I’ve always found that word [“hipster”] is used with such disdain, like it’s always used by chubby bloggers who aren’t getting laid anymore and are bored, and they’re just so mad at these young kids for going out and getting wasted and having fun and being fashionable,” he says. “I’m dubious of these hypotheses because they always smell of an agenda.”
What is WRONG with McInnes?! He isn't mad at hipsters for "going out and getting wasted and having fun and being fashionable"? How does he not understand the sheer magnitude of the crime that these kids are committing against the entirity of Western civilization!? Young people? Having FUN? It's hard to believe that the cops haven't gotten involved, that Senate hearings haven't been convened, and that the issue hasn't come before the UN Security Council. I hope these groups pull their shit together--and pull it together soon.

Punks wear their tattered threads and studded leather jackets with honor, priding themselves on their innovative and cheap methods of self-expression and rebellion. B-boys and b-girls announce themselves to anyone within earshot with baggy gear and boomboxes. But it is rare, if not impossible, to find an individual who will proclaim themself a proud hipster. It’s an odd dance of self-identity – adamantly denying your existence while wearing clearly defined symbols that proclaims it.
Seriously. These punks with their "cheap and innovative methods of self-expression and rebellion" (none of these inexpensive vintage clothes or art parties) and these b-boys and b-girls (who drive to bars in Escalades blaring rap, so much less obnoxious than those pestering kids on fixed gears) are exactly what we should all aspire to be. Not only should we adopt a group identity, but we should be proud of it and proclaim it to anyone who listens. The fact that, as Haddow has already demonstrated, the label of "hipster" is worthless and empty means that there is absolutely no reason for these kids--or anyone else--to deny being a hipster. Hell, from now on I'll be referring to everyone I know as hipsters.

Perhaps the true motivation behind this deliberate nonchalance is an attempt to attract the attention of the ever-present party photographers, who swim through the crowd like neon sharks, flashing little blasts of phosphorescent ecstasy whenever they spot someone worth momentarily immortalizing.
Completely true. People at other parties and of other social groups do not enjoy taking photos and having photos taken. Ever been to a sorority party? Now that's a social group that abhors the camera, hiding from it at every chance. Obviously, the only real solution to this hipster-photo problem is for all of us to adopt the values of the college Greek system.

In many ways, the lifestyle promoted by hipsterdom is highly ritualized. Many of the party-goers who are subject to the photoblogger’s snapshots no doubt crawl out of bed the next afternoon and immediately re-experience the previous night’s debauchery. Red-eyed and bleary, they sit hunched over their laptops, wading through a sea of similarity to find their own (momentarily) thrilling instant of perfected hipster-ness.
Once again, I have to advocate the sorority life style in response to this rather obvious and hipster-specific fact.

What they may or may not know is that “cool-hunters” will also be skulking the same sites, taking note of how they dress and what they consume. These marketers and party-promoters get paid to co-opt youth culture and then re-sell it back at a profit. In the end, hipsters are sold what they think they invent and are spoon-fed their pre-packaged cultural livelihood.
Haddow writes almost as if we are living in a capitalistic country, as if our entire economy is built around people trying to sell us--any of us--anything we'll buy. What a foolish idea! If this were really true, there'd be an Urban Outfitters and an American Apparel in every major American city. Moreover, hipsters would be completely unaware of the fact that these two stores existed solely for the purpose of selling their own "culture" back to them at a profit.

Hipsterdom is the first “counterculture” to be born under the advertising industry’s microscope, leaving it open to constant manipulation but also forcing its participants to continually shift their interests and affiliations. Less a subculture, the hipster is a consumer group – using their capital to purchase empty authenticity and rebellion. But the moment a trend, band, sound, style or feeling gains too much exposure, it is suddenly looked upon with disdain. Hipsters cannot afford to maintain any cultural loyalties or affiliations for fear they will lose relevance.
Haddow is completely right, once again. The advertising industry, a very recent development, is only now, in the 21st century, beginning to capitalize on "countercultures" in the Western world. I mean, just because Woodstock, the apex of the 1960's countercultural movement, was planned as an extremely profitable, moneymaking, capitalist event (and was almost successful at this) means nothing. The youth movements of the 1960's were full of integrity, completely lacking consumerism. Honestly, considering the genuine purity and selflessness of all those involved in the movement, it's amazing they're not still continuing today.

And this whole hipster system of changing loyalties! Yeah, some of them might have an undying allegience to The Smiths or Joy Division or even Bright Eyes, but those bands don't count. And the fact that hipsters fall all over themselves to support bands--for one album only--is dispicable. Maybe they've ended up giving bands like Wolf Parade, Clap Your Hands Say Yeah, and Vampire Weekend chances the artists never would have had otherwise, but the fact that they didn't continue to give these artists such opportunities by swearing an unconditional allegiance to them is ridiculous. Who cares that Clap Your Hands Say Yeah's second album was legitimately worse than their first? Hipsters should have bought it anyways.

An amalgamation of its own history, the youth of the West are left with consuming cool rather that creating it. The cultural zeitgeists of the past have always been sparked by furious indignation and are reactionary movements. But the hipster’s self-involved and isolated maintenance does nothing to feed cultural evolution. Western civilization’s well has run dry. The only way to avoid hitting the colossus of societal failure that looms over the horizon is for the kids to abandon this vain existence and start over.

Wait! The youth of the West are "left with consuming cool rather than creating it?" So who's creating it? And "the cultural zeitgeists of the past have always been sparked by furious indignation and are reactionary movements"? How indignant does Haddow really think Marcel Duchamp was when he submitted a urinal to his early 20th century art show? Or da-da-ism as a whole? It's hardly indignant! And pop art? Andy Warhol and Roy Lichenstein as furious? And Robert Rauschenberg! That guy only did what made him happy, and it happened to be considered genius. How about when the Beatles looked to traditional Indian music and Ravi Shankar as they created their music? They were simply recycling the past, but it's considered some of the best pop music ever created. Why do these kids need to start over? How are these kids so culturally secluded if, as Haddow mentioned earlier in his essay, they are able to "easily blend in and mutate other social movements, sub-cultures and lifestyles"? And the idea that this group of kids are going to single handedly cause the Western world to "hit the colossus of societal failure"? You have to be kidding me. And still Haddow isn't done.

The half-built condos tower above us like foreboding monoliths of our yuppie futures. I take a look at one of the girls wearing a bright pink keffiyah and carrying a Polaroid camera and think, “If only we carried rocks instead of cameras, we’d look like revolutionaries.” But instead we ignore the weapons that lie at our feet – oblivious to our own impending demise.

We are a lost generation, desperately clinging to anything that feels real, but too afraid to become it ourselves. We are a defeated generation, resigned to the hypocrisy of those before us, who once sang songs of rebellion and now sell them back to us. We are the last generation, a culmination of all previous things, destroyed by the vapidity that surrounds us. The hipster represents the end of Western civilization – a culture so detached and disconnected that it has stopped giving birth to anything new.
"If only we carried rocks!" Haddow laments, helpless in his own impotency. If only! If only! What creates any great movement, cultural or countercultural is a great leader. In recent struggles of Palestinians and even hipsters, cameras have acted as inaluable tools. In fact, cameras might be the greatest non-violent weapon of today. Perhaps if Haddow was to motivate and organize his peers instead of nitpicking and deriding, today's youth would be out doing something like registering their peers to vote, or inventing new film movements,
or beginning the world wide fight to save sharks or discovering how to biodegrade plastic bags in three months as sixteen-year-old, future hipsters.

Let me quote the hipster favorite The Rapture: "People don't dance no more/They just stand there like this/They cross their arms and stare you down and drink and moan and diss."

It's easy to complain. Haddow can complain about hipsters, and I can complain at Haddow. It's a vicious cycle. In the end, Haddow is one in a long line of those who have critiqued contemporary culture. He's covered no new ground in his essay, and in the end, just like what he's derided, he's left with nothing but an analog camera in his hand. Perhaps instead of complaining about today's hipster culture, Haddow should go out and create his own. But hey, why be proactive and positive when it's so much easier--and cooler--to reiterate all the things that have already been said?

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

The resubmission to government instruction and the advent of Tour de Fat

I hope everyone knows that the Tour de Fat is returning to Austin next weekend. Sponsored by New Belgium, Tour de Fat is dedicated "spreading the good word about the positive societal offerings of the bicycle. Costumes and decorated bikes reign supreme as the participants come to ride in the bike parade, then gather in the merriment of good music, entertainment, and tasty beer. Amid the hoopla, Tour de Fat raises money – $806,000 to date! – for local charities, increases awareness for reducing your waste stream, signs people up for Team Wonderbike, and culminates in a Car Bike Swap, where the winner gets a custom Black Sheep New Belgium Commuter bike. Admission to the Tour de Fat is free.
All profits from beer sales go to local non profit organizations."If you want to read more, you can see the website here, and you can read about the Austin itenerary here. In any case, because the event is to raise money, they asked for volunteers. And who volunteered? Yours truly, of course. The job I volunteered for required TABC certification, and since mine expired in July, I needed to renew Fortunately, the Tour is going to reimburse me, but that doesn't change the fact that taking the certification course is literally painful.

Not only does the course take four hours, but it's boring, and stupid as hell. It was divided into seven sections, each of which ended in a short set of questions. These are very challenging--here's one, for example.
If I drink this, will my sinus infection go away or will my fetus die? Will I be happy about it or sad about it?

I'm glad they're easy, but did I really need to sit through half an hour of redundant information to answer that? I think not. Although it would be very, very convenient if alcohol were an oral contraceptive, it unfortunately is not. Just imagine how quickly abortion rates and condom sales would plummet. Women would be able to have their cake and eat it too, and we would all be happy. Except for Trojan.

Moving on, the course informed me that it was illegal to sell alcohol to a drunkard. I know you're wondering how a drunkard is legally defined, but don't worry, the course quickly explained.Wooo! We're all drunkards!

"A drunkard is one who is in the habit of drinking until drunk."

Yes. This means that everyone I know (except Leah) is a drunkard. Pretty much anyone that is served alcohol at any bar is a drunkard. We are all drunkards! Wear the label, be proud.

But drunkards aren't the only people it's illegal to serve. You are also prohibitted from serving insane people, which the course illustrated with a picture of what I assume is supposed to be an insane person.Only lonely people go crazy.

Yes. This is undoubtedly an insane girl. The moral of this is that lonley people, especially people who might be emo, are probably insane. They can be anywhere, and strike any time. What the course fails to discuss, however, is the penalties for serving an insane drunkard alcohol. Are these greater or less than serving either a sane drunk or a sober lunatic?

The course went on to describe methods that can be used to identity minors, and this was undoubtedly the section with the best information.
To sum these two slides up, pretty much any asshole or whore in a bar probably could be underage. This is very helpful.

As the course continues, our insane girl makes another appearence.


You'd be terrefied too if you'd shat yourself insane.

She is now on the slide for "Common Indicatiors of Intoxication," which--hello!-- means someone has been breaking the law. Her libations seem to have increased her level of insanity, as well, as she now looks frightened and paranoid rather than lonely. As one reads the checklist of indictators, one realizes that she exhibits almost none of the symptoms listed. Although she undoubtedly shows mental confusion, it is more likely attributable to her mental state rather than her blood alcohol content. She could perhaps be considered disheveled--she does have that hair in her face, but we have no indication of any of the others. And bladder/bowel control? If this was really so common, those stories or people getting wasted and shitting or pissing all over wouldn't be quite so hilarious (actually, poop is hilarious no matter how many times it happens). In any case, if someone is pissing and shitting themselves while ordering drinks, the bartender isn't going to giving them a beer, they're going to be kicking them out. Perhaps our friend the insane girl has actually shat herself. This would perfectly explain the fact that she is hugging her back to the wall and has an expression of sheer terror on her face.

Now, because alcohol is not an oral conceptive, the course also discusses fetal alcohol syndrome, which is a very serious consideration. However, as someone who serves alcohol, you're required to serve to pregnant women. If they want to fuck up their child, you're not allowed to prevent them. Basically, it's the pregnant woman's right to destroy her future child if she wants, but hey! At least they'll show you a really terrifying photo of an extreme close-up of a crying baby's face while you read about it.
I just really don't think that photo is necessary.

Now, just in case your irresponsible, pregnant customer decides to drive home, and for some reason you get off work in time to encounter her on the road, the course gives some very important tips about how to tell if someone is driving drunk, which include "varied speeds," "weaving or swerving," and "head out of the window."


Basically, if you're Lloyd Christmas or Harry Dunne, you probably drive like you're drunk.


Because I finally found my camera cord and I've been talking about alcohol, here is a photo of me and Jimi for your enjoyment.

Are you laughing at me yet?

Monday, October 6, 2008

I have a problem.

Yes. I am admitting it.

I succumb to my impusles at least ten times a day. Yes, it's that bad.

My problem is this: I want another bicycle.

When I originally bought Dolly, I had no problems. It was my irst time buying a bicycle, and I was absolutely thrilled. I loved her, I rode her, and I gave her streamers. What more could a bicycle want?

Dolly and I, as previously posted.

I was happy, Dolly was happy. We were happy. Our happiness lasted about two years (this is about how long your "love pheromones" are supposed to last. I know this is true, because the woman on The Real Housewives of Orange County said so). It was about this time that I decided that, as much as I loved Dolly, I wanted to invest in something a little bit more... practical.

With Fidel's help, I purchased a 51 cm KHS Winner, which I never named.
The unnamed KHS Winner.


Now, I liked this bike; she (he?) was in decent shape, only cost me $80, and was a called a "Winner." Uhm, amazing. Unfortuntately, I could barely stand over the top bar, even on my tip toes. My toes were no where near the ground when I needed to stop at a stop sign or stop light... and thus I decided that I needed another bicycle.

I embarked on my Craig's List quest with intrepid bravado, and jumped at a $100 1980's steel frame Huffy that came up. Some quick research showed me that the victorious 1980's USA Olympic cycling team had used Huffy--before the brand Wal-marted out, that is--and that was a good sign. I showed up, the bicycle was decent, and Eileen entered my life


Eileen and I on Corey's front porch, the night of the Harvest Moon Cruze.

Now, Eileen is a decent little bicycle. She's a 10-speed converted to a single speed, but that didn't bother me so much, since I'd been riding a single-speed, coaster brake cruiser around for two years. In fact, Dolly was a big step up. Now, I'm not saying she's perfect, I've only been riding her around for about two months, and she's had her share of flats, and while she masquerades as a single speed, she lacks horizontal drops... but on my own end, I've drunkenly fallen off more than once and even ridden into a parked car. She's been a great learning bicycle.

However, Eileen is a 19 inch frame, which, according to the nifty converter on my Apple's OSX Dashboard tells me is equivalent to 48.26 cm. Here is the problem.

Buying bicycles is really, really fun. Really fun. Way fun. You should try it. It's like sex or potato chips or gummy bears or probably tattoos (although I have none). Once you lose your virginity or eat a Pringle or get a tattoo, you can't just quit. It doesn't work like that. And buying bicycles is the same way. It's like starting a relationship with someone you can break up with at any time with no hard feelings, and you'll never have to see them again. In the meantime you'll go through a lot together, share tears and blood and emotions or whatnot (okay, maybe you don't "share blood" in relationships), you'll either improve the bicycle or ride it into the ground, and the bicycle will either take you places and tone you up, or will flake out on you when you most need it. These things will determine your relationship. And like relationships, unless you're one of those crazy kids who's now engaged to your highschool sweetheart (I didn't even HAVE a high school sweetheart), you're going to want more than one bicycle.

This is where my problem comes in.

I want a new bicycle. I don't want a 48.26 cm bicycle, I want a 49 cm bicycle. And I want it to be purple. I don't care if it's single speed, fixed gear, or 21 speed; I don't care if it's men's frame, women's frame, or mixte; I don't care if it's American, Japanese, or Italian. I just fucking want it.

And this is bad. This means I spend at least an hour (okay, maybe not an hour) on bicycle craigslist every day. An hour total. Not at one time. And I know it's bad, because I recognized the bicycle my friend posted on Craigslist and asked him about it, before he even told me he was moving.

But it's just... buying bicycles already feels so good. I can't imagine how good buying the perfect bicycle feels.

Friday, October 3, 2008